Joe Duffy (www.OffshoreInsiders.com)

With apologies to the androgynous David Bowie, if you don’t want to be a richer man than don’t face the strain.  But if you do want to profit when handicapping basketball, your “gonna” have to be a changed man.

With the top high school players more likely to enter the NBA draft and if not stay in college for a cup of coffee, the sharp player has to recognize the complexities that it brings to handicapping.

There are many reasons why Young Turk handicappers have surpassed some old school prognosticators. The obvious reason is so many of the moth-eaten soothsayers use out-of-date handicapping techniques ignoring the Internet and various computer programs. However less obvious but even more importantly is also not acknowledging that once tried and true theories have become obsolete.

Among the examples:

Senior leadership: the great seniors of the past are now third and fourth year NBA players.  Maryland was the exception in 2002 not because of experience but it just so happened that Maryland was a throwback—two superstar seniors.  Lonny Baxter and Juan Dixon did not lead Maryland to the Promised Land because they were seniors, but because they were two NBA prospects that actually stayed around for four years.  Plenty of teams could compete with them as far as veterans on the roster, but none were in the same league talent wise.

Unlike the recent past, never handicap so-called leadership ahead of talent. Perhaps an academic school like Duke or Stanford will combine both, but if a teams four-year players are not going to be found on a lot All-Conference or All-American teams, don’t be counting on their birth certificates to compensate for lack of height, muscle and speed.

Talent will overcome lack of experience, but you can keep your bookmaker in business waiting for the reverse to happen.

If the opposite were the case, mid-major teams would wear the glass slipper every year, as they are the schools that have more four-year players than the big boys.

I will put my back-to-back great recruiting classes of sophs and frosh ahead of your senior laden team whose top player is a mid level Australian league back-up prospect.

Preseason publications: I use to quietly giggle at those who said preseason publications were worthless once the season tips off.  Related to what is stated above, the supermarket year books used to be very valuable as the squads with the most returning starters always got out of the gate the quickest, while teams with the most new quality talent would peak late. However once March came it was time to go back to betting on the vets.

Street & Smith’s and the many worthy imitations used to be ideal reference books for such. Of course one would have to make adjustments for injuries, but I successfully used my endless pile of storehouse arsenal throughout the year.

Up until the mid-90s I would compile the consensus predictions of all the publications.  I would weigh each conference’s official coaches’ poll 50/50 with the hacks’ cumulative opinion as I found these to be good power ratings.

When a team with consensus preseason conference rating of say 5.6 (average predicted finish) was a big favorite to a team with a rating of 2.4 and the teams were healthy, but the “5.6” team was playing much better, the comparative consensus ratings were a gold mine in sorting out overachieving and underachieving teams.

More times than not, the hypothetical situation said look for both teams to return to their talent level and bet the “2.4” team.

With such turnover on the rosters, teams are much streakier and so much harder to predict than 10 and 20 years ago.  Looking at a team’s recent three and five game performance is more valuable than ever. College hoop squads don’t “rise and fall to their level” like they used to.

Bigger homecourt advantage.  Don’t take me out of context. I never said there is no difference between a freshman and sophomore-laden team and one with a bunch of third and fourth-year starters.  Lack of maturity shows up on the road a lot more than at home. Home court advantage, especially in the first 15-20 games is as big as it ever was.  Home dogs and small favorites, especially when playing well, deserve a longer look-see more than ever before.

In 1985, those theories that worked in 1980 and even 1970 often held up.  No only has the game itself but thanks to technology the way sharp players handicap has also been greatly altered. Hence so had the way the lines are made and moved.

Too many dinosaur diviners are estimating today’s outcomes with yesterday’s attitude.  So handicappers, time better change you, because you can’t trace time.

Joe Duffy is CEO of OffshoreInsiders.com.  He has twice been Chair of a worldwide search committee to compile the world’s top sports services, once for the Freescoreboard scorephone and now at OffshoreInsiders.com